Skip to main content
btc$78,936+0.28%eth$2,468-1.28%usdt$0.9999+0.01%bnb$695.32-1.31%xrp$1.47-2.33%usdc$0.9999+0.00%sol$98.20+2.20%trx$0.3426-0.52%figr_heloc$1.04hype$79.52-1.17%zec$834.85-2.56%doge$0.0897-3.37%rain$0.0145+2.88%usds$0.9999+0.01%link$11.57-1.31%leo$9.36-0.18%btc$78,936+0.28%eth$2,468-1.28%usdt$0.9999+0.01%bnb$695.32-1.31%xrp$1.47-2.33%usdc$0.9999+0.00%sol$98.20+2.20%trx$0.3426-0.52%figr_heloc$1.04hype$79.52-1.17%zec$834.85-2.56%doge$0.0897-3.37%rain$0.0145+2.88%usds$0.9999+0.01%link$11.57-1.31%leo$9.36-0.18%
CoinPulse
E

Ether.fi

Non-custodial Ethereum staking and restaking at multi-billion scaleNot published
6.76 / 10100% measured
#13 of 15 in Staking platforms
$4.37B
Value locked
DefiLlama
0
Audits
DefiLlama
3.5 yr
Track record
public record
5
Chains
DefiLlama
143 ms
Latency
our probe

Ether.fi is a non-custodial staking and restaking protocol for Ethereum. In our latest snapshot it holds roughly $4.4B in total value and is deployed across 5 chains, which puts it among the larger operators we track under Staking platforms, though it ranks 13/15 there on our combined score of 6.76.

How does Ether.fi work?

When you stake ETH you receive a liquid staking token that represents your deposit plus accrued rewards. Because the model is non-custodial, deposits are governed by smart contracts rather than by a company holding your withdrawal keys. Rewards originate from Ethereum's proof-of-stake consensus, where validators earn for proposing and attesting to blocks. A portion of stake can also be routed into restaking to help secure additional services in exchange for extra yield and extra risk.

What did our measurements find?

We recorded an interface response time of 143 ms, which is fast, and an operating history of about 3.5 years. Our snapshot did not capture completed third-party audit reports for this entry, so its audit signal scores low in our model. That is a gap in our data rather than proof of anything, so before committing meaningful capital, read the current audit and bug-bounty disclosures directly on the project's own site. We also did not detect a dedicated public status page.

What are the main risks?

  • Smart-contract risk: funds sit in code that can contain bugs despite review.
  • Restaking risk: opting into restaking layers adds slashing and dependency exposure beyond plain staking.
  • Peg and liquidity risk: liquid staking tokens can trade below the value of the underlying ETH during market stress.
  • Validator penalties: operator downtime reduces rewards, and slashing events can cut principal.

How does it compare in our data?

Within Staking platforms, Ether.fi is one of the larger entries by value we track, yet its overall 6.76 sits mid-pack because our model weights more than size. The category leaders here tend to pair long operating histories with detected public status pages, and this entry lacks a recorded status page and logged audits in our snapshot. Read the ranking as a reliability-signal summary rather than a verdict on the product itself.

Who is it for?

Ether.fi suits ETH holders who want liquid, non-custodial exposure and are comfortable managing DeFi wallets and reading contract-level disclosures. It is a weaker fit for people who prefer a regulated custodian, a phone-in support desk, or who would rather avoid the added complexity that restaking introduces. Whatever your profile, treat staking rewards as variable and never stake funds you cannot afford to lock up or lose.

How Ether.fi scores

Scored on the criteria that matter for staking platforms.

Staking platforms#13 of 156.76 / 10100% measured
SCALEScale of value trusted
30% weight9/10

$4.37B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
22% weight9/10

Live 3.5 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
18% weight2/10

No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
STATUSStatus transparency
16% weight2/10

No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTC
PERFLatency
14% weight10/10

Median 143 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Who it’s NOT for

Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

FAQ

Is Ether.fi custodial?+

No. It uses a non-custodial, smart-contract model, so you hold your position through a wallet rather than handing withdrawal keys to a company. That shifts responsibility to you for wallet security and for understanding the contracts.

Does CoinPulsePoint verify Ether.fi's APY?+

No. We do not publish or endorse yield figures. We assess scale (about $4.4B), multi-chain reach (5 chains), interface latency (143 ms) and operating history (about 3.5 years). Check live rewards on the protocol's own dashboard.

Why is the audit score low?+

Our snapshot did not record completed third-party audits for this entry, so the audit criterion scores 2/10. Treat that as missing data on our side and confirm current audit reports directly with the project.

What is restaking and why does it matter here?+

Restaking reuses staked ETH to secure additional protocols for extra rewards. It also stacks additional slashing and smart-contract dependencies on top of ordinary staking, so it raises both the potential yield and the downside.