Skip to main content
btc$78,936+0.28%eth$2,468-1.28%usdt$0.9999+0.01%bnb$695.32-1.31%xrp$1.47-2.33%usdc$0.9999+0.00%sol$98.20+2.20%trx$0.3426-0.52%figr_heloc$1.04hype$79.52-1.17%zec$834.85-2.56%doge$0.0897-3.37%rain$0.0145+2.88%usds$0.9999+0.01%link$11.57-1.31%leo$9.36-0.18%btc$78,936+0.28%eth$2,468-1.28%usdt$0.9999+0.01%bnb$695.32-1.31%xrp$1.47-2.33%usdc$0.9999+0.00%sol$98.20+2.20%trx$0.3426-0.52%figr_heloc$1.04hype$79.52-1.17%zec$834.85-2.56%doge$0.0897-3.37%rain$0.0145+2.88%usds$0.9999+0.01%link$11.57-1.31%leo$9.36-0.18%
CoinPulse
J

Jupiter Lend

Newer Solana lending from the Jupiter ecosystemNot published
5.68 / 10100% measured
#14 of 15 in Lending platforms
$1.09B
Value locked
DefiLlama
0
Audits
DefiLlama
1.0 yr
Track record
public record
1
Chains
DefiLlama
156 ms
Latency
our probe

Jupiter Lend is a lending product within the Jupiter ecosystem on Solana, best known for its aggregation and trading tools. It lets users supply assets and borrow against collateral on-chain. It is a newer entrant and ranks fourteenth of fifteen in our Lending platforms category, with a score of 5.68.

How it works

As an on-chain lending venue, it follows the standard pattern: suppliers deposit assets to earn interest, borrowers post collateral and take overcollateralized loans, and positions that fall below their required ratio can be liquidated. Being part of a widely used Solana ecosystem can bring integration and liquidity advantages, but the product itself is relatively young.

Why does the audit gap matter so much?

An audit is an independent review of a protocol's code for security flaws. It is not a guarantee, but it is one of the strongest signals a lending protocol can offer, because a single contract bug can drain deposits. When our data shows no audits on record, it does not prove the code is unsafe, but it does mean a key layer of external scrutiny is not evidenced. Combined with a short track record, that puts more of the burden on the user to accept meaningful uncertainty before depositing.

What our data shows

Our measurements record roughly $1.1B in total value locked on a single chain, with about 1.0 year of on-chain history for the tracked deployment. Two points stand out for caution: our data shows no audits on record, and the status page could not be confirmed. A young protocol with no audits evidenced is a materially higher-risk profile, even with meaningful deposits.

Risks to take seriously

  • Audit gap: our data records no audits, so independent code review is not evidenced here.
  • Short track record: around one year gives limited history through varied market conditions.
  • Single-chain exposure: dependence on Solana's uptime and performance.
  • Liquidation and oracle risk: standard for any money market and amplified by a shorter record.

Who is it for?

Jupiter Lend may appeal to Solana users comfortable with newer protocols who want lending tightly integrated with the broader Jupiter toolset. It is less suitable for risk-averse users, who will generally prefer longer-established, clearly audited markets, and for anyone unwilling to accept the uncertainty of a young, unaudited-on-record product.

We assess scale, audits, track record, chain reach, latency and status transparency. We do not measure interest rates; check them directly, and weigh the audit gap carefully.

How Jupiter Lend scores

Scored on the criteria that matter for lending platforms.

Lending platforms#14 of 155.68 / 10100% measured
SCALEScale of value trusted
30% weight9/10

$1.09B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
28% weight2/10

No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
20% weight6/10

Live 1.0 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
12% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
STATUSStatus transparency
10% weight5/10

A status page exists but publishes no feed we could parse — readable, not auditable. Part of that may be our blind spot (we read three platforms).

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Who it’s NOT for

Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

FAQ

Is Jupiter Lend audited?+

Our data records no audits for this entry. That is a meaningful gap: independent code review is a key risk-reducer for lending protocols, and its absence here warrants extra caution.

How established is Jupiter Lend?+

It is relatively new, with about one year of on-chain history in our data. A shorter record means less evidence of how it behaves across different market conditions.

What chain does it use?+

Jupiter Lend operates on Solana, and our data tracks it on that single chain. Its performance depends on Solana's uptime and throughput.

What does coinpulsepoint assess here?+

We look at scale, audits, track record, chain reach, latency and status transparency. We do not measure rates. For this protocol, the audit and track-record findings are the most important signals.