RocketSwap Anubis is a decentralized exchange offering on-chain token swaps on a single network. It is a very new entrant, and reliable public information about it is limited, so this profile stays deliberately narrow and sticks to what our data shows.
What our data shows
RocketSwap Anubis ranks 15 of 15 in Decentralized exchanges with a score of 3.98, the lowest in this category. It held around $188.1M in total value locked at our last reading, which is a substantial figure. However, it has been live for only about 56 days, roughly two months, giving it almost no track record. Our review did not find published audits, we could not record a reliable interface latency, and we found no public status page or working reference URL at review time.
Why the low score
The rating is driven by how little we can verify, not by any specific finding of wrongdoing. A very short history, no confirmed audits, missing performance data, and no status page all weigh heavily in our transparency-conscious scoring. A high TVL on a two-month-old, thinly documented venue is itself a reason for caution rather than comfort.
Significant caveats
- Minimal track record. At about 56 days, there is little history on which to judge reliability or team follow-through.
- No verified audits. Smart-contract risk should be treated as high.
- Sparse public information. Limited documentation and no reliable reference URL make independent verification harder.
How to think about a venue this young
New protocols are not inherently bad, and some of today's established names were once two months old. The difficulty is that at this stage there is almost nothing to distinguish a serious, careful team from an opportunistic or fragile one using public signals alone. Time is the test that has not yet been run. A rapidly accumulated total value locked can reflect genuine demand, aggressive incentives, or concentrated deposits that could leave as quickly as they arrived; from the outside those look similar. That ambiguity is the whole point of caution here.
Who it is for
Realistically, only highly experienced, risk-tolerant users who can perform their own contract-level due diligence should consider a venue this new and this thinly documented. For most users, waiting for a longer track record and published audits is the more prudent path.
Our scoring reflects measurable public signals only. We accept no affiliate income and offer no investment advice.