ChangeNOW vs StealthEX
ChangeNOW wins on measured health — 9.8/10 against 7.8/10. Note the coverage gap: we measured 100% of the criteria for ChangeNOW and 80% for StealthEX. Some of that gap is the finding — a service that publishes less can be measured less.
Last collection 2026-08-25: probed 252 services, measured 233, over a 90-day window.
| Measured | ChangeNOW | StealthEX |
|---|---|---|
| Status now | Major outage | Not published |
| Score On what we could measure: 100% of the criteria weight for ChangeNOW, 80% for StealthEX. | 9.8/10 | 7.8/10 |
| Age | 9.7 yr | 8.7 yr |
| Latency (our probe) | 92 ms | 109 ms |
| Median fix | 58 min | — |
| Status feed | statuspage | none |
ChangeNOW
9.8 / 10100% measuredLive 9.7 yr (since founding (2017), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.
Median 92 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.
Publishes a machine-readable incident archive (statuspage) — its whole record can be checked by anyone, including against us.
Median 58 min from published report to resolution across 49 logged incidents. Scored on repair speed, not on how many it logged.
StealthEX
7.8 / 1080% measuredLive 8.7 yr (since founding (2018), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.
Median 109 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.
No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.
No incident feed we can read, so no repair time to compute.
Status transparency: No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.
Anyone who needs to know when it breaks: no status feed, so you find out it is down by discovering it yourself.
No affiliate links or ads anywhere on this site. How this is funded · Methodology · Full instant exchangers ranking