Zora vs SuperRare
Zora wins on measured health — 8.76/10 against 7.72/10. Note the coverage gap: we measured 58% of the criteria for Zora and 80% for SuperRare. Some of that gap is the finding — a service that publishes less can be measured less.
Last collection 2026-08-25: probed 252 services, measured 233, over a 90-day window.
| Measured | Zora | SuperRare |
|---|---|---|
| Status now | Not published | Not published |
| Score On what we could measure: 58% of the criteria weight for Zora, 80% for SuperRare. | 8.76/10 | 7.72/10 |
| Age | 6.7 yr | 8.7 yr |
| Latency (our probe) | 785 ms | 641 ms |
| Median fix | — | — |
| Status feed | blocked | unknown |
Zora
8.76 / 1058% measuredLive 6.7 yr (since founding (2020), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.
Median 785 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.
Their status host turned our probe away — the page exists and we could not read it, so n/a rather than a mark against them.
No incident feed we can read, so no repair time to compute.
Latency: Median 785 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.
SuperRare
7.72 / 1080% measuredLive 8.7 yr (since founding (2018), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.
Median 641 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.
A status page exists but publishes no feed we could parse — readable, not auditable. Part of that may be our blind spot (we read three platforms).
No incident feed we can read, so no repair time to compute.
Status transparency: A status page exists but publishes no feed we could parse — readable, not auditable. Part of that may be our blind spot (we read three platforms).
No affiliate links or ads anywhere on this site. How this is funded · Methodology · Full nft marketplaces ranking