Skip to main content
btc$78,936+0.28%eth$2,468-1.28%usdt$0.9999+0.01%bnb$695.32-1.31%xrp$1.47-2.33%usdc$0.9999+0.00%sol$98.20+2.20%trx$0.3426-0.52%figr_heloc$1.04hype$79.52-1.17%zec$834.85-2.56%doge$0.0897-3.37%rain$0.0145+2.88%usds$0.9999+0.01%link$11.57-1.31%leo$9.36-0.18%btc$78,936+0.28%eth$2,468-1.28%usdt$0.9999+0.01%bnb$695.32-1.31%xrp$1.47-2.33%usdc$0.9999+0.00%sol$98.20+2.20%trx$0.3426-0.52%figr_heloc$1.04hype$79.52-1.17%zec$834.85-2.56%doge$0.0897-3.37%rain$0.0145+2.88%usds$0.9999+0.01%link$11.57-1.31%leo$9.36-0.18%
CoinPulse
C

CCIP

Chainlink's cross-chain interoperability and token protocolNot published
4.92 / 10100% measured
#15 of 15 in Crypto bridges
$1.81B
Value locked
DefiLlama
0
Audits
DefiLlama
83 days
Track record
public record
21
Chains
DefiLlama
53 ms
Latency
our probe

What is CCIP?

CCIP (Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol) is Chainlink's framework for cross-chain messaging and token transfers. Like other interoperability layers, it is closer to a messaging and transfer protocol than a single lock-mint vault, with security built around Chainlink's oracle networks and an independent risk-management layer that monitors cross-chain activity.

Our measured data

CCIP reaches 21 chains in our data, a strong reach signal, and we measured a fast 53 ms endpoint latency. Associated value is around $1.8B. Despite the reach, its overall score is 4.92, ranking 15th of 15 in our bridge set. Two factors drive that: our review did not credit audits in scope, and the track-record signal in our data is thin. No public status page was found.

How to interpret the score

A last-place ranking here should be read carefully. It reflects what our automated scan captured, low audit and track-record signals, rather than a judgment that the protocol is unsafe; Chainlink is a widely used infrastructure provider. The genuine, honest caveat for any cross-chain protocol is that security depends on the verifier and risk-management design and on how each integration is configured. Interoperability layers are a repeated exploit target, and losses across the bridge sector have reached the hundreds of millions in single incidents, so integration-level scrutiny matters.

Who is it for?

  • Good fit: Developers and users who want broad reach with an oracle-based security and monitoring model.
  • Poor fit: Users who select purely on our headline score or want a published status page and clear single-vault audit trail.

The honest summary is that our ranking and Chainlink's real-world standing measure different things. Our table rewards captured audit and track-record signals, which were thin for this entry, while the protocol's design leans on oracle-network security and an independent monitoring layer that our score does not evaluate directly. If you are choosing an interoperability route, weigh the specific integration, its verifier setup and how much value it already carries above any single headline number, ours included. Our figures are a point-in-time snapshot of reach, value and latency and do not capture per-application configuration, which is where cross-chain risk concentrates.

How CCIP scores

Scored on the criteria that matter for crypto bridges.

Crypto bridges#15 of 154.92 / 10100% measured
AUDITSecurity audits
32% weight2/10

No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
SCALEScale of value trusted
28% weight9/10

$1.81B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
20% weight2/10

Live 83 days (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
12% weight10/10

Deployed on 21 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
STATUSStatus transparency
8% weight2/10

No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTC
Where we docked points

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Who it’s NOT for

Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

FAQ

Why does CCIP rank last if Chainlink is well known?+

Our score reflects captured signals like audits and track record, which were thin in our scan. It is not a verdict that the protocol is unsafe.

How is CCIP secured?+

It relies on Chainlink's oracle networks plus an independent risk-management layer that monitors cross-chain flows. Configuration still matters per integration.

Does CoinPulsePoint capture Chainlink's full audit history?+

No. We credit audits within our review scope only. Absence in our data is not proof that no audits exist.