Skip to main content
btc$78,936+0.28%eth$2,468-1.28%usdt$0.9999+0.01%bnb$695.32-1.31%xrp$1.47-2.33%usdc$0.9999+0.00%sol$98.20+2.20%trx$0.3426-0.52%figr_heloc$1.04hype$79.52-1.17%zec$834.85-2.56%doge$0.0897-3.37%rain$0.0145+2.88%usds$0.9999+0.01%link$11.57-1.31%leo$9.36-0.18%btc$78,936+0.28%eth$2,468-1.28%usdt$0.9999+0.01%bnb$695.32-1.31%xrp$1.47-2.33%usdc$0.9999+0.00%sol$98.20+2.20%trx$0.3426-0.52%figr_heloc$1.04hype$79.52-1.17%zec$834.85-2.56%doge$0.0897-3.37%rain$0.0145+2.88%usds$0.9999+0.01%link$11.57-1.31%leo$9.36-0.18%
CoinPulse
F

Function FBTC

Wrapped Bitcoin for DeFi with multi-party custodyNot published
5.36 / 10100% measured
#10 of 15 in Crypto bridges
$683.5M
Value locked
DefiLlama
0
Audits
DefiLlama
2.1 yr
Track record
public record
1
Chains
DefiLlama
52 ms
Latency
our probe

Function FBTC overview

Function FBTC is a wrapped Bitcoin token aimed at DeFi use. Like other wrapped BTC products, it represents Bitcoin on-chain against reserves, with the design emphasizing a custody arrangement intended to reduce single-party control over the underlying BTC. The aim is a wrapped BTC that lending, trading and yield protocols can integrate as collateral or a trading asset.

What we measured

Our data shows about $683.5M in associated value, ranking Function FBTC 10th of 15 with a score of 5.36. Endpoint latency was low at roughly 52 ms, and the tracked deployment is around 2 years old, giving a reasonable track-record signal. Our review did not credit audits in scope and found no public status page, which are the main limitations reflected in the score.

How to think about the risk

For any wrapped Bitcoin, the decisive question is how the underlying BTC is held and redeemed. A multi-party custody design can reduce reliance on one entity, but it does not eliminate counterparty and operational risk, and it introduces its own coordination assumptions. Without audits captured in our scan or a public status page, external transparency is limited from our perspective. As always with wrapped and bridged Bitcoin, verifying reserves and redemption rights is more important than headline convenience, given the sector's record of large exploits.

Who is it for?

  • Good fit: DeFi users who want Bitcoin exposure and prefer a distributed custody model over a single custodian.
  • Poor fit: Users who require published audits, live status reporting, or fully self-custodied BTC exposure.

Bottom line

Function FBTC sits in a familiar wrapped-Bitcoin trade-off: a custody design intended to spread control, weighed against the fact that any wrapped BTC ultimately depends on reserves you do not hold yourself. Its reasonable operating age and low latency are positives, but the lack of audits in our scan and of a public status page limits how much external assurance we can point to. Anyone using it in DeFi should read the current custody and redemption documentation directly rather than inferring backing from market price. Our figures are a point-in-time reading of value, reach and latency and do not verify reserves or track fees.

How Function FBTC scores

Scored on the criteria that matter for crypto bridges.

Crypto bridges#10 of 155.36 / 10100% measured
AUDITSecurity audits
32% weight2/10

No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
SCALEScale of value trusted
28% weight8/10

$683.5M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
20% weight8/10

Live 2.1 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
12% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
STATUSStatus transparency
8% weight2/10

No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTC
Where we docked points

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Who it’s NOT for

Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

FAQ

How is Function FBTC different from other wrapped BTC?+

It emphasizes a multi-party custody design intended to reduce single-entity control of the underlying Bitcoin. Counterparty and operational risks still apply.

Does CoinPulsePoint verify FBTC's reserves?+

No. We assess value in scope, audits, reach, latency and status-page availability. We do not independently verify custody or reserve backing.

Why is its status score low?+

Our scan found no public status page and did not credit audits within scope, which limits operational transparency from our vantage point.