Skip to main content
btc$78,936+0.28%eth$2,468-1.28%usdt$0.9999+0.01%bnb$695.32-1.31%xrp$1.47-2.33%usdc$0.9999+0.00%sol$98.20+2.20%trx$0.3426-0.52%figr_heloc$1.04hype$79.52-1.17%zec$834.85-2.56%doge$0.0897-3.37%rain$0.0145+2.88%usds$0.9999+0.01%link$11.57-1.31%leo$9.36-0.18%btc$78,936+0.28%eth$2,468-1.28%usdt$0.9999+0.01%bnb$695.32-1.31%xrp$1.47-2.33%usdc$0.9999+0.00%sol$98.20+2.20%trx$0.3426-0.52%figr_heloc$1.04hype$79.52-1.17%zec$834.85-2.56%doge$0.0897-3.37%rain$0.0145+2.88%usds$0.9999+0.01%link$11.57-1.31%leo$9.36-0.18%
CoinPulse
P

Portal

Multichain lock-and-mint bridge powered by WormholeNot published
8.24 / 10100% measured
#1 of 15 in Crypto bridges
$1.57B
Value locked
DefiLlama
2
Audits
DefiLlama
4.5 yr
Track record
public record
24
Chains
DefiLlama
105 ms
Latency
our probe

Portal, at a glance

Portal is a token bridge powered by the Wormhole interoperability network. It uses a lock-and-mint model: an asset is locked on the source chain and a wrapped version is minted on the destination. This lets tokens move across a wide range of ecosystems from a single interface. It is best understood as general-purpose asset transport rather than a route tied to any one chain.

Why it ranks first here

Portal tops our bridge category, ranking 1st of 15 with a score of 8.24. It combines the broadest practical reach in our set with strong track-record and audit signals: our data shows 24 chains, about $1.6B in associated value, two audits in scope, and roughly 105 ms latency. The tracked deployment is about 4.5 years old. The main gap is the absence of a public status page.

The honest security picture

Reach and longevity are real strengths, but history demands candor: the Wormhole network suffered one of the largest bridge exploits in crypto, with roughly $325M drained in early 2022 before funds were replenished. Lock-and-mint bridges concentrate value and depend on the correctness of their guardian/verifier set and contracts, exactly the profile attackers target. The subsequent audits and continued operation are meaningful, but users should size positions with the sector's exploit history firmly in mind rather than assuming past incidents cannot recur.

Who is it for?

  • Good fit: Users who need wide multichain coverage from one bridge and accept lock-and-mint risk.
  • Poor fit: Users who want canonical-only routes, minimal wrapped-asset exposure, or a live status page.

Bottom line

Portal earns its top ranking here on breadth, longevity and audit signals, and it remains one of the most widely integrated ways to move assets across many ecosystems. But the lock-and-mint model concentrates value and depends on the correctness of its verifier set and contracts, and the network's history includes a nine-figure exploit. Both facts are true at once. Use it when wide coverage genuinely matters, size positions with the sector's record in mind, and remember that our figures are a point-in-time snapshot of value, reach and latency that does not capture every configuration or the state of guardian security on a given day.

How Portal scores

Scored on the criteria that matter for crypto bridges.

Crypto bridges#1 of 158.24 / 10100% measured
AUDITSecurity audits
32% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
SCALEScale of value trusted
28% weight9/10

$1.57B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
20% weight9/10

Live 4.5 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
12% weight10/10

Deployed on 24 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
STATUSStatus transparency
8% weight2/10

No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTC
Where we docked points

Status transparency: No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.

Who it’s NOT for

Anyone who needs to know when it breaks: no status feed, so you find out it is down by discovering it yourself.

FAQ

Is Portal the same as Wormhole?+

Portal is the token bridge built on the Wormhole network. Wormhole is the underlying interoperability layer that carries the cross-chain messages.

Has Portal or Wormhole ever been exploited?+

Yes. The Wormhole network was exploited for roughly $325M in early 2022, with funds later replenished. We reflect this history because bridge risk is real.

Why does it rank first despite that history?+

Our score weighs reach, value, audits in scope and track record, where Portal is strong. It does not erase exploit risk, which we flag explicitly.