Skip to main content
btc$82,637-0.42%eth$2,499-2.44%usdt$0.9992-0.01%bnb$742.72-3.38%xrp$1.40-1.05%usdc$0.9996-0.00%sol$110.33-4.00%trx$0.3320-1.23%figr_heloc$1.03—zec$1,228+0.35%hype$86.10-1.20%doge$0.0850-3.73%xmr$540.38-2.66%usds$0.9994+0.04%wbt$81.23-1.70%link$12.88-1.96%btc$82,637-0.42%eth$2,499-2.44%usdt$0.9992-0.01%bnb$742.72-3.38%xrp$1.40-1.05%usdc$0.9996-0.00%sol$110.33-4.00%trx$0.3320-1.23%figr_heloc$1.03—zec$1,228+0.35%hype$86.10-1.20%doge$0.0850-3.73%xmr$540.38-2.66%usds$0.9994+0.04%wbt$81.23-1.70%link$12.88-1.96%
CoinPulse

Best defi protocols

Blue-chip DeFi by value locked. We scored 15 of them 0–10 from public data — tvl across the protocol (defillama) — and ranked the 15 we could measure well enough to place fairly. No affiliate links: the order reflects the evidence, nothing else.

Top rated
Aave V3
9.24/10100% measured
Runner-up
Lido
9.14/10
Coverage
15 ranked
15 registered

Last collection 2026-08-25: probed 252 services, measured 233, over a 90-day window. Collected by our own script, not by hand — reproducible, and reproducibly boring.

The full ranking

#ServiceScoreTVLAuditsAgeChains
1Aave V39.24100%$17.31B24.4y21
2Lido9.1476%$23.84B2—5
3Morpho Blue8.63100%$9.56B22.6y42
4SSV Network8.6376%$12.56B2—1
5Binance staked ETH8.61100%$9.24B23.3y2
6SparkLend8.61100%$4.46B23.3y2
7Maple8.4976%$3.06B2—2
8EigenCloud8.35100%$6.61B23.2y1
9Sky Lending8.1476%$5.72B2—1
10JustLend V18.1476%$3.71B2—1
11Ethena USDe8.11100%$4.07B22.5y1
12ether.fi Stake7.18100%$4.37B03.5y5
13BlackRock BUIDL6.94100%$3.45B02.1y8
14Tether Gold6.94100%$3.29B02.1y8
15Babylon Protocol6.07100%$3.11B01.8y1

Every figure carries the date it was taken, on the service’s card below, linked to its open source. Score is out of what we could measure — the % beside it is coverage.

How we scored defi protocols

These weights belong to this category alone. Signature measurement here: TVL across the protocol (DefiLlama) — Blue-chip DeFi: the scale of value trusted is the headline, with audits and longevity behind it. STATUS not scored for on-chain protocols.

SCALE
37%↑13
Scale of value trusted

How much value the market trusts it with — TVL, reserves or market cap.

AUDIT
26%↑6
Security audits

Published third-party security audits, with links to the findings.

TRACK
24%↑6
Track record

How long it has run and survived — time is signal.

REACH
13%↑3
Multi-chain reach

How many chains it is deployed across.

Latency in this category is timed at the live interface for every service, so the comparison is like-for-like. We never compare latency across categories — a DEX interface and an exchange API are not the same thing, and pretending otherwise would just reward whoever we happened to probe more cheaply.

The brief also defines FEES and UX (0%, 0%). We don’t publish them: we can’t measure them ourselves, and an estimate dressed as a measurement is worse than a gap. Full methodology

The services

9.24 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
37% weight10/10

$17.31B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
26% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
24% weight9/10

Live 4.4 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
13% weight10/10

Deployed on 21 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Measured, but not scored
Incidents logged0 / 30 days

Over the 90 days the feed covers. Not scored — logging granularity varies between services.

Where we docked points

Security audits: 2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

L
Not publishedFull review →
9.14 / 1076% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
49% weight10/10

$23.84B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
34% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
n/a

No documented launch or listing date to measure age from.

REACHMulti-chain reach
17% weight9/10

Deployed on 5 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Security audits: 2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

8.63 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
37% weight9/10

$9.56B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
26% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
24% weight8/10

Live 2.6 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
13% weight10/10

Deployed on 42 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Security audits: 2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

8.63 / 1076% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
49% weight10/10

$12.56B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
34% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
n/a

No documented launch or listing date to measure age from.

REACHMulti-chain reach
17% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Multi-chain reach: Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

8.61 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
37% weight9/10

$9.24B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
26% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
24% weight9/10

Live 3.3 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
13% weight8/10

Deployed on 2 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
Measured, but not scored
Response time26 ms

Timed at a different surface from the rest of this category, so not a fair comparison — not scored.

Where we docked points

Security audits: 2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

S
8.61 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
37% weight9/10

$4.46B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
26% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
24% weight9/10

Live 3.3 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
13% weight8/10

Deployed on 2 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Security audits: 2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

M
Not publishedFull review →
8.49 / 1076% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
49% weight9/10

$3.06B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
34% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
n/a

No documented launch or listing date to measure age from.

REACHMulti-chain reach
17% weight8/10

Deployed on 2 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Security audits: 2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

8.35 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
37% weight9/10

$6.61B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
26% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
24% weight9/10

Live 3.2 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
13% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Multi-chain reach: Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

8.14 / 1076% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
49% weight9/10

$5.72B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
34% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
n/a

No documented launch or listing date to measure age from.

REACHMulti-chain reach
17% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Multi-chain reach: Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

8.14 / 1076% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
49% weight9/10

$3.71B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
34% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
n/a

No documented launch or listing date to measure age from.

REACHMulti-chain reach
17% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Multi-chain reach: Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

8.11 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
37% weight9/10

$4.07B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
26% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
24% weight8/10

Live 2.5 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
13% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Measured, but not scored
Response time635 ms

Timed at a different surface from the rest of this category, so not a fair comparison — not scored.

Where we docked points

Multi-chain reach: Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

7.18 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
37% weight9/10

$4.37B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
26% weight2/10

No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
24% weight9/10

Live 3.5 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
13% weight9/10

Deployed on 5 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Who this is NOT for

Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

6.94 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
37% weight9/10

$3.45B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
26% weight2/10

No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
24% weight8/10

Live 2.1 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
13% weight9/10

Deployed on 8 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Who this is NOT for

Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

6.94 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
37% weight9/10

$3.29B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
26% weight2/10

No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
24% weight8/10

Live 2.1 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
13% weight9/10

Deployed on 8 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Who this is NOT for

Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

6.07 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
37% weight9/10

$3.11B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
26% weight2/10

No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
24% weight6/10

Live 1.8 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
13% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Who this is NOT for

Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

Who we left out, and why

We looked at 15, ranked 15.

Head to head

How to choose defi protocols

Blue-chip DeFi by value locked — and the honest truth is that no single ranking fits everyone. Our scores tell you what is best-evidenced on public data: tvl across the protocol (defillama). Use them as a shortlist, not a verdict.

Start at the top of the table, then open the full breakdown for any service you are considering. Read the coverage figure beside its score — a high number on thin coverage is a narrower claim than the same score fully measured. Check the “where we docked points” and “who it’s not for” notes on each card; the service that scores highest overall is not always the one that fits your specific need. And remember what these scores deliberately leave out — fees and support quality — which you should weigh yourself before committing.

DeFi protocols ratings — FAQ

How are defi protocols ranked on this page?+

Each service is scored 0–10 from public data — tvl across the protocol (defillama) — weighted for what matters in this category, plus our own latency and status checks. 15 of 15 are ranked; the rest we could not measure enough to place fairly. Every figure is dated and links to its source.

What is the best defi protocol?+

On the data we could measure, Aave V3 scores highest at 9.24/10, ahead of Lido (9.14/10). "Best" here means best-evidenced, not most advertised — open each service below for the full breakdown and decide what fits your needs.

Why isn’t the biggest name at the top?+

Size is not a criterion. A large service that publishes no audits or status page cannot demonstrate its safety from the outside, so it scores below a smaller one that can — even if it is perfectly sound. We rate what is verifiable, not what is famous.

What does the "% measured" figure under a score mean?+

It is the share of this category's criteria weight we could actually fill for that service. Anything we could not measure is marked n/a and its weight is redistributed across the rest — never counted as zero — so the percentage tells you how complete the verdict is.

Do you earn money from these rankings?+

No. There are no affiliate links, no paid placements and no sponsored entries anywhere in the ratings section. That is what lets this list put a smaller, audited service above a bigger, opaque one.

No affiliate links, paid placements or ads anywhere on this site. How this is funded · Methodology