Skip to main content
CoinPulse
Head to head · Decentralized exchanges

Quickswap Dex vs SushiSwap

Quickswap Dex
Not published
7.38
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#4 of 17
vs
SushiSwap
Not published
7.37
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#5 of 17

Quickswap Dex scores higher: 7.38/10 against 7.37/10. It leads on 1 of 5 criteria, SushiSwap on 1.

Data collected No affiliate links How scores are built

Criterion by criterion

Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.

Scale of value trusted32% of the scoreLevel
Quickswap Dex6
SushiSwap6
Why these marks ↓
Quickswap Dex
$49.7M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
SushiSwap
$96.3M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Security audits27% of the scoreLevel
Quickswap Dex6
SushiSwap6
Why these marks ↓
Quickswap Dex
1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.Evidence ↗
SushiSwap
1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.Evidence ↗
Track record19% of the scoreLevel
Quickswap Dex10
SushiSwap10
Why these marks ↓
Quickswap Dex
Live 6.3 yr (since launch (2020; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
SushiSwap
Live 6.3 yr (since launch (2020; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Multi-chain reach13% of the scoreSushiSwap leads
Quickswap Dex8
SushiSwap10
Why these marks ↓
Quickswap Dex
Deployed on 2 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.Evidence ↗
SushiSwap
Deployed on 44 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.Evidence ↗
Latency9% of the scoreQuickswap Dex leads
Quickswap Dex10
SushiSwap7
Why these marks ↓
Quickswap Dex
Median 73 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗
SushiSwap
Median 423 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗

The numbers side by side

MeasuredQuickswap DexSushiSwap
Value locked$49.7M$96.3M
Published audits11
Track record6.3 yr6.3 yr
Chains244
Latency (our probe)73 ms423 ms

Where each one falls short

Quickswap Dex

Scale of value trusted: $49.7M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

SushiSwap

Scale of value trusted: $96.3M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

Which to choose

Which scores higher overall, Quickswap Dex or SushiSwap?+

Quickswap Dex scores 7.38/10 against 7.37/10 for SushiSwap, on the same criteria and weights. We measured 100% of the score for Quickswap Dex and 100% for SushiSwap.

Which to choose if latency matters most?+

Quickswap Dex: 10/10 against 7/10 for SushiSwap on latency. Median 73 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location.

Which to choose if multi-chain reach matters most?+

SushiSwap: 10/10 against 8/10 for Quickswap Dex on multi-chain reach. Deployed on 44 chains (DefiLlama).

Other comparisons

Full decentralized exchanges ranking