Skip to main content
CoinPulse
Head to head · Crypto bridges

WBTC vs Hyperliquid Bridge

WBTC scores 7.78/10 and Hyperliquid Bridge 7.6/10 in the CoinPulse crypto bridges ranking (data collected October 19, 2026), fourth and fifth of 15. Both have 100% of their score measured, and they tie on the two heaviest criteria: one published audit link on DefiLlama each (score 6), and value locked in the same band. The 0.18-point gap comes from WBTC's longer record, partly offset by Hyperliquid Bridge's second chain. Read it as a near-tie on measured evidence between two services that do different jobs.

WBTC
Not published
7.78
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#4 of 15
vs
Hyperliquid Bridge
Not published
7.6
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#5 of 15

WBTC scores higher: 7.78/10 against 7.6/10. It leads on 1 of 4 criteria, Hyperliquid Bridge on 1.

Data collected No affiliate links How scores are built

Criterion by criterion

Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.

Security audits35% of the scoreLevel
WBTC6
Hyperliquid Bridge6
Why these marks ↓
WBTC
1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.Evidence ↗
Hyperliquid Bridge
1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.Evidence ↗
Scale of value trusted30% of the scoreLevel
WBTC9
Hyperliquid Bridge9
Why these marks ↓
WBTC
$9.63B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Hyperliquid Bridge
$6.78B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Track record22% of the scoreWBTC leads
WBTC10
Hyperliquid Bridge8
Why these marks ↓
WBTC
Live 7.3 yr (since launch (2019; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Hyperliquid Bridge
Live 2.5 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Multi-chain reach13% of the scoreHyperliquid Bridge leads
WBTC6
Hyperliquid Bridge8
Why these marks ↓
WBTC
Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.Evidence ↗
Hyperliquid Bridge
Deployed on 2 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.Evidence ↗

What the 0.18 gap is made of

  • Track record: +0.44 to WBTC. 7.3 years (counted from July 1, 2019, because the record gives only the launch year) scores 10, and 2.5 years since DefiLlama listing scores 8. The listing date is a floor on Hyperliquid Bridge's true age.
  • Chain reach: +0.26 to Hyperliquid Bridge. Two chains score 8 and one chain scores 6.
  • Audits and value locked: 0. One published audit link each on DefiLlama, which is a count of links rather than of audits, and $9.63B and $6.78B fall in the same log-scale band.

Two different jobs

WBTC is a bitcoin-backed token on Ethereum. Holders mainly care how the underlying bitcoin is held and redeemed. Hyperliquid Bridge is rated here as the bridge contract DefiLlama tracks for moving funds into Hyperliquid. CoinPulse rates it separately from the Hyperliquid perpetuals venue and its spot order book, so the perp exchange's score does not apply here.

Two practical notes before using either:

  • Check which Hyperliquid route you are using. Hyperliquid's developer docs, checked October 23, 2026, describe its Arbitrum USDC bridge ("Bridge2") as legacy and deprecated, with CCTP preferred. They warn that deposits under 5 USDC are not credited and are lost. Separately, LayerZero runs a frontend it also calls "the Hyperliquid Bridge", which is a different product.
  • WBTC's single chain is DefiLlama's count. WBTC's custodian has issued WBTC on other chains through LayerZero's OFT standard since 2024. The reach score reflects only what DefiLlama attributes to the WBTC entry.

What neither score covers

  • Custody and redemption terms (WBTC), and validator or signer arrangements (Hyperliquid Bridge). Neither is scored.
  • Deposit and withdrawal fees, transfer times and the interface. Not measured, so this page states no fee figures.
  • Hack history: not scored for bridges. DefiLlama's hack database returned no match for either service on October 19, 2026. That covers one database only.
  • Unscored latency probe: app.hyperliquid.xyz answered in 43 ms and wbtc.network in 183 ms (category median 84 ms).

Which fits which reader

  • You want the longest operating record: WBTC, at 7.3 years, the longest in the bridge ranking.
  • You are funding a Hyperliquid account: Hyperliquid Bridge is the relevant service. Its score says nothing about the exchange itself, and you should confirm the current deposit route in Hyperliquid's docs first.
  • You care most about audits or capital at stake: the scores do not separate these two. Both have one published audit link on DefiLlama and sit in the same value-locked band.

The numbers side by side

MeasuredWBTCHyperliquid Bridge
Value locked$9.63B$6.78B
Published audits11
Track record7.3 yr2.5 yr
Chains12

Where each one falls short

WBTC

Security audits: 1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

Hyperliquid Bridge

Security audits: 1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

Which to choose

Which scores higher, WBTC or Hyperliquid Bridge?+

WBTC, by 0.18 (7.78 vs 7.6). It is ahead on track record and behind on chain reach.

Is the Hyperliquid Bridge score the same as Hyperliquid's exchange rating?+

No. The bridge is rated in the crypto bridges category. The perpetuals venue has its own rating with different criteria and weights.

Other comparisons

Full crypto bridges ranking