Skip to main content
CoinPulse
Head to head · Instant exchangers

SideShift vs SimpleSwap: the two instant exchangers compared on open data

SideShift scores 8.66/10 and SimpleSwap 8.24/10 on data collected October 19, 2026, ranking #2 and #3 of 13 [instant exchangers](/ratings/instant-exchangers/). Both are fully measured, have been operating for the same 8.3 years and have no hack on record. They split the two remaining criteria: SideShift gains because it has a public status page, and SimpleSwap gains because its site responded faster. On balance the status page is worth more under this category's weights.

Data collected October 19, 2026 · No affiliate links · How scores are built

SideShift
Status page, no readable feed
8.66
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#2 of 13
vs
SimpleSwap
Not published
8.24
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#3 of 13

SideShift scores higher: 8.66/10 against 8.24/10. It leads on 1 of 4 criteria, SimpleSwap on 1.

Data collected No affiliate links How scores are built

Criterion by criterion

Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.

Track record34% of the scoreLevel
SideShift10
SimpleSwap10
Why these marks ↓
SideShift
Live 8.3 yr (since launch (2018; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
SimpleSwap
Live 8.3 yr (since launch (2018; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Latency24% of the scoreSimpleSwap leads
SideShift9
SimpleSwap10
Why these marks ↓
SideShift
Median 390 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗
SimpleSwap
Median 197 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗
Status transparency22% of the scoreSideShift leads
SideShift5
SimpleSwap2
Why these marks ↓
SideShift
A status page exists but publishes no feed we could parse — readable, not auditable. Part of that may be our blind spot (we read three platforms).Evidence ↗
SimpleSwap
No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.
Security record20% of the scoreLevel
SideShift10
SimpleSwap10
Why these marks ↓
SideShift
No hack or exploit recorded against it in DefiLlama’s database of 1,307 incidents, checked 2026-10-19. Absence from the record is not a guarantee, but every major loss in crypto ends up there.Evidence ↗
SimpleSwap
No hack or exploit recorded against it in DefiLlama’s database of 1,307 incidents, checked 2026-10-19. Absence from the record is not a guarantee, but every major loss in crypto ends up there.Evidence ↗

Where the 0.42-point gap comes from

  • Status transparency: +0.66 for SideShift. SideShift publishes a status page, but no feed the collector can read (5/10). No status page was found for SimpleSwap (2/10). A page you can at least look at is more than nothing, but it is not an auditable incident history.
  • Latency: +0.24 for SimpleSwap. SimpleSwap's site answered in a median 197 ms and SideShift's in 390 ms, measured from one probe location. The category median is 107.5 ms. SimpleSwap stays in the top band and SideShift drops one band.
  • Net: 0.66 − 0.24 = 0.42 in SideShift's favor.

SimpleSwap's #3 place needs one caveat. It shares 8.24 with six other services, and the methodology publishes no tie-break, so on this evidence it is level with Changelly, StealthEX and the rest of that group, not ahead of them.

What the scores leave out

Neither score covers exchange rates, spreads, network fees, when a service may request identity checks or hold a swap, restricted countries, or support quality. These often matter more for a single swap than a 0.42-point difference does. Compare live quotes and read each provider's terms.

Which fits which reader

  • If you want some outside view of whether the service is up, SideShift at least has a status page you can open, even though it is not machine-readable. SimpleSwap has none, so you would find out about an outage by running into it.
  • If you want a SimpleSwap alternative with the same age and hack record, SideShift is the closest higher-scored option. The difference is in transparency, not track record.
  • If site responsiveness matters to you, SimpleSwap measured faster. Note that this is page response time, not how fast a swap settles.

The numbers side by side

MeasuredSideShiftSimpleSwap
Track record8.3 yr8.3 yr
Latency (our probe)390 ms197 ms
Hacks on record00
Status feedunknownnone

Where each one falls short

SideShift

Status transparency: A status page exists but publishes no feed we could parse — readable, not auditable. Part of that may be our blind spot (we read three platforms).

SimpleSwap

Status transparency: No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.

Not for: Anyone who needs to know when it breaks: no status feed, so you find out it is down by discovering it yourself.

Which to choose

Which scores higher, SideShift or SimpleSwap?+

SideShift scores 8.66/10 against 8.24/10 for SimpleSwap, on the same criteria and the same October 19, 2026 data.

Do SideShift or SimpleSwap have a hack on record?+

Neither appears in DefiLlama's public hack database as of the October 19, 2026 check. Absence from one database is not a guarantee.

Is SimpleSwap the same as "simple swap" modes in other apps?+

No. SimpleSwap here is the service at simpleswap.io. Some wallets and DEX apps use "simple swap" as a feature name, and those are not rated on this page. More comparisons: ChangeNOW vs SideShift · SimpleSwap vs Changelly · ChangeNOW vs SimpleSwap · Full ranking

Other comparisons

Full instant exchangers ranking