Skip to main content
CoinPulse
Head to head · Instant exchangers

SimpleSwap vs Changelly: a tie on measured data

SimpleSwap and Changelly both score 8.24/10 on data collected October 19, 2026. They receive the same mark on every one of the four criteria for instant exchangers, with 100% of each score measured. The ranking lists SimpleSwap at #3 and Changelly at #4, but seven services share 8.24 and no tie-break is published, so neither is ahead on this evidence. Their raw numbers do differ, and that may matter to you even though it does not change the score.

Data collected October 19, 2026 · No affiliate links · How scores are built

SimpleSwap
Not published
8.24
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#3 of 13
vs
Changelly
Not published
8.24
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#4 of 13

A tie on what we measured. Both score 8.24/10. The difference between them is not something our data can see, so we are not going to invent one.

Data collected No affiliate links How scores are built

Criterion by criterion

Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.

Track record34% of the scoreLevel
SimpleSwap10
Changelly10
Why these marks ↓
SimpleSwap
Live 8.3 yr (since launch (2018; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Changelly
Live 11.3 yr (since launch (2015; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Latency24% of the scoreLevel
SimpleSwap10
Changelly10
Why these marks ↓
SimpleSwap
Median 197 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗
Changelly
Median 107 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗
Status transparency22% of the scoreLevel
SimpleSwap2
Changelly2
Why these marks ↓
SimpleSwap
No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.
Changelly
No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.
Security record20% of the scoreLevel
SimpleSwap10
Changelly10
Why these marks ↓
SimpleSwap
No hack or exploit recorded against it in DefiLlama’s database of 1,307 incidents, checked 2026-10-19. Absence from the record is not a guarantee, but every major loss in crypto ends up there.Evidence ↗
Changelly
No hack or exploit recorded against it in DefiLlama’s database of 1,307 incidents, checked 2026-10-19. Absence from the record is not a guarantee, but every major loss in crypto ends up there.Evidence ↗

Why they tie

Both reach the maximum on track record, latency and security record. Both also lose the same 1.76 points on status transparency, because neither publishes a public status page that anyone outside the company can check. That one criterion is the entire gap between each of them and the category leader, ChangeNOW (10/10).

Differences the score does not count

  • Time in operation: Changelly has 11.3 years, the longest record of any instant exchanger rated here. SimpleSwap has 8.3 years. The criterion maxes out well below both, so the extra three years earn no points, though they do mean Changelly has operated through more market cycles.
  • Response time: Changelly's site answered in a median 107 ms and SimpleSwap's in 197 ms, from one probe location. The category median is 107.5 ms. Both are in the top band.

What neither score covers

The scores do not cover rates, spreads, fees, identity-check or hold policies, restricted countries or support. Since the measured evidence is tied, these unmeasured factors are what will actually separate the two for your swap. Get live quotes for the same pair and amount from both, and read each provider's terms.

Which fits which reader

  • If you want a Changelly alternative that is equally strong on this data, SimpleSwap scores the same. The same is true of the other five services tied at 8.24. A higher-scored alternative means ChangeNOW (10) or SideShift (8.66), which are separated mainly by status-page transparency.
  • If longevity is your tie-breaker, Changelly has the longer documented history.
  • If you want outside visibility of outages, neither helps: neither publishes a status page.

The numbers side by side

MeasuredSimpleSwapChangelly
Track record8.3 yr11.3 yr
Latency (our probe)197 ms107 ms
Hacks on record00
Status feednonenone

Where each one falls short

SimpleSwap

Status transparency: No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.

Not for: Anyone who needs to know when it breaks: no status feed, so you find out it is down by discovering it yourself.

Changelly

Status transparency: No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.

Not for: Anyone who needs to know when it breaks: no status feed, so you find out it is down by discovering it yourself.

Which to choose

Which is better, SimpleSwap or Changelly?+

On measured data, neither: both score 8.24/10 with identical criterion marks. Compare rates and terms for your own swap.

Why is SimpleSwap listed above Changelly if they tie?+

The two share a score with five other services. The methodology publishes no tie-break rule, so treat their listed positions as equal.

Has either been hacked?+

Neither appears in DefiLlama's public hack database as of the October 19, 2026 check. That is not a guarantee that no incident has occurred. More comparisons: Changelly vs StealthEX · SideShift vs SimpleSwap · ChangeNOW vs SimpleSwap · Full ranking

Other comparisons

Full instant exchangers ranking