Lido vs Rocket Pool
Lido wins on measured health — 9.09/10 against 8.38/10. Note the coverage gap: we measured 76% of the criteria for Lido and 100% for Rocket Pool. Some of that gap is the finding — a service that publishes less can be measured less.
Last collection 2026-08-25: probed 252 services, measured 233, over a 90-day window.
| Measured | Lido | Rocket Pool |
|---|---|---|
| Status now | Not published | Not published |
| Score On what we could measure: 76% of the criteria weight for Lido, 100% for Rocket Pool. | 9.09/10 | 8.38/10 |
| Value locked | $23.84B | $1.31B |
| Audits | 2 | 2 |
| Age | — | 4.8 yr |
| Chains | 5 | 1 |
Lido
9.09 / 1076% measured$23.84B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.
2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.
No documented launch or listing date to measure age from.
Deployed on 5 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.
Security audits: 2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.
Rocket Pool
8.38 / 10100% measured$1.31B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.
2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.
Live 4.8 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.
Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.
Multi-chain reach: Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.
No affiliate links or ads anywhere on this site. How this is funded · Methodology · Full liquid staking ranking