Skip to main content
CoinPulse
Head to head · Crypto exchanges

Bitstamp vs Bitvavo: a near tie on open data

Bitstamp scores 9.18/10 and Bitvavo 9.16/10 on CoinPulse's crypto exchange ranking (#3 and #4 of 19), on data collected October 19, 2026. Both have 100% of the score measured. The 0.02-point gap is the net of two opposite strengths: Bitstamp holds far more on-chain reserves tracked by DefiLlama, while Bitvavo has no hack on record and Bitstamp has one from 2015. Before the scores matter, check availability: Bitvavo is a Europe-focused exchange and third-party trackers list the US as restricted.

Data collected October 19, 2026 · No affiliate links

Bitstamp
Operational
9.18
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#3 of 19
vs
Bitvavo
Operational
9.16
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#4 of 19

Bitstamp scores higher: 9.18/10 against 9.16/10. It leads on 1 of 5 criteria, Bitvavo on 1.

Data collected No affiliate links How scores are built

Criterion by criterion

Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.

Scale of value trusted28% of the scoreBitstamp leads
Bitstamp9
Bitvavo7
Why these marks ↓
Bitstamp
$4.67B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Bitvavo
$296.6M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Track record20% of the scoreLevel
Bitstamp10
Bitvavo10
Why these marks ↓
Bitstamp
Live 15.3 yr (since launch (2011; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Bitvavo
Live 8.3 yr (since launch (2018; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Status transparency18% of the scoreLevel
Bitstamp10
Bitvavo10
Why these marks ↓
Bitstamp
Publishes a machine-readable incident archive (statuspage) — its whole record can be checked by anyone, including against us.Evidence ↗
Bitvavo
Publishes a machine-readable incident archive (statuspage) — its whole record can be checked by anyone, including against us.Evidence ↗
Security record18% of the scoreBitvavo leads
Bitstamp7
Bitvavo10
Why these marks ↓
Bitstamp
1 hack on record in DefiLlama’s database: 2015-01 phishing ($5.2M). Scored on what users lost after any funds were returned, with older incidents weighing less.Evidence ↗
Bitvavo
No hack or exploit recorded against it in DefiLlama’s database of 1,307 incidents, checked 2026-10-19. Absence from the record is not a guarantee, but every major loss in crypto ends up there.Evidence ↗
Latency16% of the scoreLevel
Bitstamp10
Bitvavo10
Why these marks ↓
Bitstamp
Median 60 ms to first byte from a public API endpoint, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗
Bitvavo
Median 33 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Timed at the live interface rather than a public API endpoint like most of this category, so scored on the interface bands.Evidence ↗

Why it is a near tie

  • Reserves (+0.56 to Bitstamp). On the log scale, $4.67B earns 9 and $296.6M earns 7. Bitstamp's tracked reserves are roughly 16 times larger. Two marks at 28% weight is 0.56 points.
  • Security record (+0.54 to Bitvavo). Bitstamp's January 2015 phishing loss of $5.2M scores 5, plus two points for being more than three years old: 7. Bitvavo has nothing in DefiLlama's database of 1,307 incidents: 10.
  • Net: 0.56 − 0.54 = 0.02.

A gap this small is within what one changed mark at the next collection would undo. Treat the two as level overall and decide on the criterion you care about.

Where the numbers need care

  • Latency surfaces differ. Bitstamp was timed at a public API endpoint, Bitvavo at its live interface, each scored on its own bands. Both reach 10, but 60 ms vs 33 ms is not a like-for-like speed comparison.
  • Outage history, shown but not scored. Over the 90-day window Bitvavo's status feed logged 8.33 incidents per 30 days with a median of 2,553 minutes from report to resolution; Bitstamp's logged 2 per 30 days with a median of 312 minutes. Companies log differently, so this is context, but readers who depend on uptime may want to open both status archives and read the entries.
  • Track record is a floor. Both clear the full-mark band. Bitstamp has run seven more years.

What is not measured

Fees, spreads, supported coins, deposit methods (for example SEPA or iDEAL), products, app experience, support, licensing and country availability are not scored. Bitvavo is described by a third-party availability tracker as serving European countries and restricting US residents (CryptoWinRate, updated September 30, 2026); confirm on Bitvavo's own terms. Bitstamp has been owned by Robinhood since June 2025 (The Block); the method rates it on its own record. Background: Bitstamp profile · Bitvavo profile.

Which fits which reader

  • You want the larger verifiable reserves and the longer history: Bitstamp ($4.67B; 15.3 years).
  • You want no hack on record: Bitvavo.
  • You are in the US: check eligibility first; Bitvavo is not listed as available to US residents by third-party trackers.
  • Uptime matters to you: read both status archives; Bitvavo's logged more incidents and longer median repair times in this window (not scored).

The numbers side by side

MeasuredBitstampBitvavo
Value locked$4.67B$296.6M
Track record15.3 yr8.3 yr
Latency (our probe)60 ms33 ms
Hacks on record10
Status feedstatuspagestatuspage

Where each one falls short

Bitstamp

Security record: 1 hack on record in DefiLlama’s database: 2015-01 phishing ($5.2M). Scored on what users lost after any funds were returned, with older incidents weighing less.

Bitvavo

Scale of value trusted: $296.6M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

Which to choose

Which scores higher, Bitstamp or Bitvavo?+

Bitstamp, 9.18 to 9.16 — effectively level. Bitstamp leads on reserves; Bitvavo leads on hack record.

Is Bitvavo safe compared with Bitstamp?+

Bitvavo has no hack recorded in DefiLlama's database; Bitstamp has one 2015 phishing loss. Bitstamp's tracked reserves are much larger. Neither fact is a safety guarantee, and both exchanges are custodial.

What are good Bitvavo or Bitstamp alternatives?+

The full crypto exchange ranking lists all 19 measured exchanges with the same criteria. Check which serve your country before comparing scores. Compare more: Gemini vs Bitstamp · Bitvavo vs Crypto.com

Other comparisons

Full crypto exchanges ranking