Skip to main content
CoinPulse
Head to head · Crypto exchanges

Bitvavo vs Crypto.com: crypto exchange scores compared

Bitvavo scores 9.16/10 and Crypto.com 8.2/10 on CoinPulse's crypto exchange ranking (#4 and #5 of 19), on data collected October 19, 2026. Both have 100% of the score measured. Crypto.com holds about eight times more on-chain reserves tracked by DefiLlama, but Bitvavo leads on two criteria: it has no hack on record, and it responded far faster to our latency probe — though the two were timed at different surfaces. US readers should note that Bitvavo is a Europe-focused exchange that third-party trackers list as unavailable to US residents.

Data collected October 19, 2026 · No affiliate links

Bitvavo
Operational
9.16
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#4 of 19
vs
Crypto.com
Operational
8.2
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#5 of 19

Bitvavo scores higher: 9.16/10 against 8.2/10. It leads on 2 of 5 criteria, Crypto.com on 1.

Data collected No affiliate links How scores are built

Criterion by criterion

Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.

Scale of value trusted28% of the scoreCrypto.com leads
Bitvavo7
Crypto.com9
Why these marks ↓
Bitvavo
$296.6M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Crypto.com
$2.42B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Track record20% of the scoreLevel
Bitvavo10
Crypto.com10
Why these marks ↓
Bitvavo
Live 8.3 yr (since launch (2018; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Crypto.com
Live 10.3 yr (since launch (2016; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Status transparency18% of the scoreLevel
Bitvavo10
Crypto.com10
Why these marks ↓
Bitvavo
Publishes a machine-readable incident archive (statuspage) — its whole record can be checked by anyone, including against us.Evidence ↗
Crypto.com
Publishes a machine-readable incident archive (statuspage) — its whole record can be checked by anyone, including against us. This is a company-wide status page shared with 1 other rated product, so it describes the company's systems rather than this product alone.Evidence ↗
Security record18% of the scoreBitvavo leads
Bitvavo10
Crypto.com6
Why these marks ↓
Bitvavo
No hack or exploit recorded against it in DefiLlama’s database of 1,307 incidents, checked 2026-10-19. Absence from the record is not a guarantee, but every major loss in crypto ends up there.Evidence ↗
Crypto.com
1 hack on record in DefiLlama’s database: 2022-01 session key compromised ($33.7M). Scored on what users lost after any funds were returned, with older incidents weighing less.Evidence ↗
Latency16% of the scoreBitvavo leads
Bitvavo10
Crypto.com5
Why these marks ↓
Bitvavo
Median 33 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Timed at the live interface rather than a public API endpoint like most of this category, so scored on the interface bands.Evidence ↗
Crypto.com
Median 435 ms to first byte from a public API endpoint, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗

What explains the 0.96-point gap

  • Reserves (+0.56 to Crypto.com). $2.42B scores 9 and $296.6M scores 7 on the log scale.
  • Security record (+0.72 to Bitvavo). Crypto.com's January 2022 session-key compromise is recorded with $33.7M lost: the under-$50M band (4) plus two points for being older than three years gives 6. Bitvavo has no entry: 10.
  • Latency (+0.80 to Bitvavo). 10 against 5 at 16% weight.
  • Net: 0.72 + 0.80 − 0.56 = 0.96.

A caveat on latency

Latency supplies most of Bitvavo's lead, and the two readings are not like for like. Crypto.com was timed at a public API endpoint (435 ms) and scored on the API bands; Bitvavo was timed at its live interface (33 ms) and scored on the interface bands. Both readings come from one location. Latency accounts for 0.80 of the 0.96-point gap; the other criteria net to 0.16 in Bitvavo's favor (0.72 − 0.56). Read the raw numbers as an indication, not a race result.

Outage history is shown on both cards but not scored: Bitvavo's status feed logged 8.33 incidents per 30 days (median 2,553 minutes to resolution) over the 90-day window; Crypto.com's logged 6.67 per 30 days (median 181 minutes).

What is not measured

Fees, spreads, coin and network support, Crypto.com's card and other consumer products, app experience, support, licensing and country availability are not scored. Bitvavo is listed as restricting US residents and serving European countries by a third-party tracker (CryptoWinRate, updated September 30, 2026); confirm on Bitvavo's own terms. Background: Bitvavo profile · Crypto.com profile.

Which fits which reader

  • You want the larger verifiable reserves and the longer history: Crypto.com ($2.42B; 10.3 years).
  • You want no hack on record: Bitvavo.
  • You trade through an API and care about response time: our data cannot settle this pair, because the surfaces differ; test both from your location.
  • You are in the US: Bitvavo is likely not an option; check eligibility before comparing further.

The numbers side by side

MeasuredBitvavoCrypto.com
Value locked$296.6M$2.42B
Track record8.3 yr10.3 yr
Latency (our probe)33 ms435 ms
Hacks on record01
Status feedstatuspagestatuspage

Where each one falls short

Bitvavo

Scale of value trusted: $296.6M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

Crypto.com

Latency: Median 435 ms to first byte from a public API endpoint, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.

Which to choose

Which scores higher, Bitvavo or Crypto.com?+

Bitvavo, 9.16 to 8.2, on October 19, 2026 data. Most of the lead comes from hack record and latency; Crypto.com leads on reserves.

Is Crypto.com safe?+

The score does not certify safety. On the evidence measured, Crypto.com has $2.42B in tracked reserves, a public status archive, 10.3 years of operation, and one recorded incident: a January 2022 session-key compromise with $33.7M lost. Read the full Crypto.com rating for the criterion-by-criterion detail. Compare more: all 19 crypto exchanges · Bitstamp vs Bitvavo

Other comparisons

Full crypto exchanges ranking