Skip to main content
CoinPulse
Head to head · Crypto exchanges

Robinhood vs Gemini: crypto exchange scores compared

Robinhood scores 9.66/10 and Gemini 9.56/10 on CoinPulse's crypto exchange ranking, on data collected October 19, 2026 — #1 and #2 of 19. Both have 100% of the score measured. The 0.10-point gap comes from two criteria: Robinhood has larger on-chain reserves tracked by DefiLlama, and Gemini has no hack on record while Robinhood has one small entry. On the other three criteria they tie.

Data collected October 19, 2026 · No affiliate links

Robinhood
Operational
9.66
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#1 of 19
vs
Gemini
Operational
9.56
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#2 of 19

Robinhood scores higher: 9.66/10 against 9.56/10. It leads on 1 of 5 criteria, Gemini on 1.

Data collected No affiliate links How scores are built

Criterion by criterion

Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.

Scale of value trusted28% of the scoreRobinhood leads
Robinhood10
Gemini9
Why these marks ↓
Robinhood
$14.92B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Gemini
$5.43B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Track record20% of the scoreLevel
Robinhood10
Gemini10
Why these marks ↓
Robinhood
Live 13.3 yr (since launch (2013; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Gemini
Live 12.3 yr (since launch (2014; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Status transparency18% of the scoreLevel
Robinhood10
Gemini10
Why these marks ↓
Robinhood
Publishes a machine-readable incident archive (statuspage) — its whole record can be checked by anyone, including against us.Evidence ↗
Gemini
Publishes a machine-readable incident archive (statuspage) — its whole record can be checked by anyone, including against us.Evidence ↗
Security record18% of the scoreGemini leads
Robinhood9
Gemini10
Why these marks ↓
Robinhood
1 hack on record in DefiLlama’s database: 2023-01 social account takeover ($8,200). Scored on what users lost after any funds were returned, with older incidents weighing less.Evidence ↗
Gemini
No hack or exploit recorded against it in DefiLlama’s database of 1,307 incidents, checked 2026-10-19. Absence from the record is not a guarantee, but every major loss in crypto ends up there.Evidence ↗
Latency16% of the scoreLevel
Robinhood9
Gemini9
Why these marks ↓
Robinhood
Median 299 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Timed at the live interface rather than a public API endpoint like most of this category, so scored on the interface bands.Evidence ↗
Gemini
Median 114 ms to first byte from a public API endpoint, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗

What explains the 0.10-point gap

  • Reserves (+0.28 to Robinhood). The heaviest criterion is scored on a log scale. $14.92B earns 10 and $5.43B earns 9; one mark at 28% weight is worth 0.28 points.
  • Security record (+0.18 to Gemini). Robinhood's single DefiLlama entry is a January 2023 social-media account takeover with $8,200 recorded lost. It would score 7 as a sub-$1M loss, plus two points because it is more than three years old, giving 9. Gemini has no entry and scores 10.
  • Net: 0.28 − 0.18 = 0.10.

Track record, status transparency and latency are level at the mark. The gap is narrow enough that a single criterion change at the next collection could reverse the order.

Where the numbers need care

  • Latency is level on marks, not on surface. Gemini was timed at a public API endpoint (114 ms). Robinhood was timed at its live interface (299 ms) and scored on the interface bands. The two raw numbers are not a like-for-like speed comparison.
  • Robinhood's track record is the company's. The 13.3 years run from Robinhood's 2013 launch as documented in its SEC registration filing. The rating covers Robinhood's crypto service, but the age figure is not the crypto product's own start date. Both still clear the 10/10 band.
  • Outage history is shown, not scored. Gemini's status feed logged 7.33 incidents per 30 days over the 90-day window, with a median 203 minutes from report to resolution. Robinhood's feed logged 0. Logging habits vary by company, which is why this is context only.

What the scores say about safety

Neither score says an exchange is safe. They say how much public evidence exists on five points. For Robinhood and Gemini that evidence is strong on all five: large DefiLlama-tracked reserves, more than a decade of operation, public incident archives, and either no hack or one very small one. What the record cannot show is solvency (reserves are not liabilities), custody arrangements, regulatory standing or non-hack problems such as a partner failure or a frozen product. Both are custodial: holding crypto there means trusting the company.

What is not measured

Fees and spreads, the coins and networks each supports, withdrawal options, staking or card products, app experience, customer support and availability in your state or country are not scored for any exchange. Check them on each company's own pages. Company background is in the Robinhood and Gemini profiles.

Which fits which reader

  • You want the largest on-chain reserves you can verify: Robinhood ($14.92B vs $5.43B).
  • You want a clean hack history in DefiLlama's database: Gemini (none recorded; Robinhood's one entry is an $8,200 social account takeover).
  • You want to audit outages yourself: either — both publish full machine-readable status archives.
  • You care about cost, coin selection or app experience: these scores do not decide it; compare fee schedules and product pages directly.

The numbers side by side

MeasuredRobinhoodGemini
Value locked$14.92B$5.43B
Track record13.3 yr12.3 yr
Latency (our probe)299 ms114 ms
Hacks on record10
Status feedstatuspagestatuspage

Which to choose

Which scores higher, Robinhood or Gemini?+

Robinhood, 9.66 to 9.56, on October 19, 2026 data. Both have 100% of the score measured.

Is Gemini crypto safe compared with Robinhood?+

On the security record criterion, Gemini has no hack recorded in DefiLlama's database and Robinhood has one $8,200 account takeover. That is the only safety-related difference the data shows; it is not a guarantee for either.

Does this compare Robinhood's crypto fees with Gemini's?+

No. Fees are not scored because an honest all-in cost needs repeated real trades on each venue. See how scores are built. Compare more: all 19 crypto exchanges · Robinhood vs Bitstamp · Gemini vs Bitstamp

Other comparisons

Full crypto exchanges ranking