Blockstream Jade vs OneKey: hardware wallet scores compared
Blockstream Jade scores 8.9/10 and the OneKey hardware wallet 8.7/10 on CoinPulse's hardware wallet ranking (#3 and #4 of 15), on data collected October 19, 2026. Both have 100% of the score measured. They tie on track record, status transparency and security record; the whole 0.20-point gap is one latency mark — and the two were timed on different surfaces, so it is a weak basis for choosing between them.
Data collected October 19, 2026 · No affiliate links
Blockstream Jade scores higher: 8.9/10 against 8.7/10. It leads on 1 of 4 criteria, OneKey on 0.
Criterion by criterion
Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.
Track record40% of the scoreLevelBlockstream Jade10OneKey10Why these marks ↓Hide ↑
Status transparency22% of the scoreLevelBlockstream Jade5OneKey5Why these marks ↓Hide ↑
Latency20% of the scoreBlockstream Jade leadsBlockstream Jade10OneKey9Why these marks ↓Hide ↑
Security record18% of the scoreLevelBlockstream Jade10OneKey10Why these marks ↓Hide ↑
The 0.20-point gap is one latency mark
Latency carries 20% of the score; one mark is worth 0.20 points. Jade earned 10 and OneKey 9. But Jade was timed at a Blockstream public API endpoint and scored on the API bands, while OneKey was timed at its website and scored on the website bands — as were most wallets in this category. The 77 ms and 352 ms readings are therefore not a direct speed comparison, and they come from a single location. In practice the two score level on everything that is measured like for like.
Both status pages are readable by people but not auditable by script: Blockstream's offers no feed in the formats the probe parses, and OneKey's host turned the probe away. Both score 5, and the method treats a blocked probe the same as an unparseable page rather than marking it lower.
Where they really differ
- Time on the market. OneKey has two more years (7.3 vs 5.3). Both are past the full-mark threshold.
- Asset scope. Blockstream Jade is built for Bitcoin and the Liquid sidechain (Blockstream). OneKey positions its devices as multi-chain; check its supported-asset list. Asset support is not scored.
- Device design. Secure-element use, firmware openness, air-gapped signing and backup options are not measured here.
What is not measured
Price, specific models (Jade or Jade Plus; OneKey's range), companion apps, support and shipping regions are outside the score. Neither maker has a company profile on the site yet.
Which fits which reader
- Bitcoin-only holders: Jade is purpose-built for that scope; OneKey is also an option if it supports what you hold.
- Multi-asset holders: check OneKey's supported list; Jade's scope is narrower.
- You want the maker with the longer record of the two: OneKey (7.3 years).
- You want an auditable outage history: neither publishes one; see Ledger vs Blockstream Jade.
The numbers side by side
| Measured | Blockstream Jade | OneKey |
|---|---|---|
| Track record | 5.3 yr | 7.3 yr |
| Latency (our probe) | 77 ms | 352 ms |
| Hacks on record | 0 | 0 |
| Status feed | unknown | blocked |
Where each one falls short
Blockstream Jade
Status transparency: A status page exists but publishes no feed we could parse — readable, not auditable. Part of that may be our blind spot (we read three platforms).
OneKey
Status transparency: A status page exists, but its host turned our probe away, so its feed cannot be read by a script — readable by people, not auditable. Scored like any status page without a parseable feed.
Which to choose
Which scores higher, Blockstream Jade or OneKey?+
Blockstream Jade, 8.9 to 8.7, on October 19, 2026 data. The difference is one latency mark measured on different surfaces; everything else is level.
Is the OneKey wallet safe?+
OneKey has no hack recorded in DefiLlama's database and 7.3 years on the market. That is evidence about the maker's record, not a test of the device's security. Compare more: all 15 hardware wallets · Trezor vs Blockstream Jade · OneKey vs NGRAVE