OneKey vs NGRAVE: hardware wallet scores compared
OneKey scores 8.7/10 and NGRAVE 8.3/10 on CoinPulse's hardware wallet ranking (#4 and #5 of 15), on data collected October 19, 2026. Both have 100% of the score measured. They are level on track record, status transparency and security record. The 0.40-point gap is entirely latency: OneKey's website answered our probe in 352 ms and NGRAVE's in 699 ms. That says something about each maker's web service — not about how either device protects your keys.
Data collected October 19, 2026 · No affiliate links
OneKey scores higher: 8.7/10 against 8.3/10. It leads on 1 of 4 criteria, NGRAVE on 0.
Criterion by criterion
Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.
Track record40% of the scoreLevelOneKey10NGRAVE10Why these marks ↓Hide ↑
Status transparency22% of the scoreLevelOneKey5NGRAVE5Why these marks ↓Hide ↑
Latency20% of the scoreOneKey leadsOneKey9NGRAVE7Why these marks ↓Hide ↑
Security record18% of the scoreLevelOneKey10NGRAVE10Why these marks ↓Hide ↑
What explains the 0.40-point gap
Latency carries 20% of the hardware wallet score. OneKey's 352 ms falls in the 9 band and NGRAVE's 699 ms in the 7 band; two marks at 20% is 0.40 points. Nothing else differs.
How much weight to give that is a reader's call. For a hardware wallet, latency measures the maker's companion web service — useful when you download firmware or use its app backend — but a single-location reading can vary for you, and it does not reflect the device.
What is level
- Track record. NGRAVE has one more year on the market (8.3 vs 7.3); both earn the full mark.
- Status transparency. Both run a status page people can read, but neither can be audited by script: OneKey's host turned the probe away, and NGRAVE's offers no feed in the formats the probe parses. Both score 5.
- Security record. Neither has an incident in DefiLlama's database of 1,307 hacks as of October 19, 2026. Absence from the database is not proof that no attack ever happened.
What is not measured
The things that usually decide between hardware wallets are outside this score: how each device generates and stores keys, whether signing is air-gapped, firmware openness, independent security research on each device, supported assets, price, app experience, support and shipping regions. Check each maker's documentation and independent reviews for those. Neither maker has a company profile on the site yet.
Which fits which reader
- You want the faster companion web service in our probe: OneKey (352 ms vs 699 ms).
- You want the slightly longer track record: NGRAVE (8.3 vs 7.3 years) — both are past the full-mark threshold.
- You want an auditable outage history: neither publishes one; Ledger is the only maker in this category that does (full ranking).
- Your decision turns on device security: this score cannot settle it.
The numbers side by side
| Measured | OneKey | NGRAVE |
|---|---|---|
| Track record | 7.3 yr | 8.3 yr |
| Latency (our probe) | 352 ms | 699 ms |
| Hacks on record | 0 | 0 |
| Status feed | blocked | unknown |
Where each one falls short
OneKey
Status transparency: A status page exists, but its host turned our probe away, so its feed cannot be read by a script — readable by people, not auditable. Scored like any status page without a parseable feed.
NGRAVE
Status transparency: A status page exists but publishes no feed we could parse — readable, not auditable. Part of that may be our blind spot (we read three platforms).
Which to choose
Which scores higher, OneKey or NGRAVE?+
OneKey, 8.7 to 8.3, on October 19, 2026 data. The only difference is website latency.
Is the OneKey wallet safe? Is the NGRAVE ZERO secure?+
Neither maker has a hack on record in DefiLlama's database, and both have operated for more than seven years. Device security design is not measured, so the score cannot certify either. Compare more: Blockstream Jade vs OneKey · Ledger vs Trezor