Magic Eden vs OpenSea
Magic Eden wins on measured health — 10/10 against 8.76/10.
Last collection 2026-08-25: probed 252 services, measured 233, over a 90-day window.
| Measured | Magic Eden | OpenSea |
|---|---|---|
| Status now | Operational | Operational |
| Score On what we could measure: 100% of the criteria weight for Magic Eden, 100% for OpenSea. | 10/10 | 8.76/10 |
| Age | 5.6 yr | 9.7 yr |
| Latency (our probe) | 141 ms | 342 ms |
| Median fix | — | 334 min |
| Status feed | statuspage | statuspage |
Magic Eden
10 / 10100% measuredLive 5.6 yr (since founding (2021), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.
Median 141 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.
Publishes a machine-readable incident archive (statuspage) — its whole record can be checked by anyone, including against us.
No incidents at all in the 90 days its feed covers — we read the feed and it is empty.
OpenSea
8.76 / 10100% measuredLive 9.7 yr (since founding (2017), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.
Median 342 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.
Publishes a machine-readable incident archive (statuspage) — its whole record can be checked by anyone, including against us.
Median 334 min from published report to resolution across 1 logged incidents. Scored on repair speed, not on how many it logged.
Incident repair time: Median 334 min from published report to resolution across 1 logged incidents. Scored on repair speed, not on how many it logged.
No affiliate links or ads anywhere on this site. How this is funded · Methodology · Full nft marketplaces ranking