Skip to main content
CoinPulse
Head to head · Perpetual DEXs

Gains Network vs Jupiter Perps

Gains Network
Not published
6.24
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#4 of 14
vs
Jupiter Perps
Status page, no readable feed
6.16
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#5 of 14

Gains Network scores higher: 6.24/10 against 6.16/10. It leads on 3 of 6 criteria, Jupiter Perps on 2.

Data collected No affiliate links How scores are built

Criterion by criterion

Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.

Scale of value trusted30% of the scoreJupiter Perps leads
Gains Network4
Jupiter Perps8
Why these marks ↓
Gains Network
$8.7M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Jupiter Perps
$745.0M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Security audits26% of the scoreGains Network leads
Gains Network6
Jupiter Perps2
Why these marks ↓
Gains Network
1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.Evidence ↗
Jupiter Perps
No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.Evidence ↗
Track record18% of the scoreGains Network leads
Gains Network9
Jupiter Perps8
Why these marks ↓
Gains Network
Live 4.9 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Jupiter Perps
Live 2.7 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Multi-chain reach10% of the scoreGains Network leads
Gains Network9
Jupiter Perps6
Why these marks ↓
Gains Network
Deployed on 5 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.Evidence ↗
Jupiter Perps
Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.Evidence ↗
Latency8% of the scoreLevel
Gains Network10
Jupiter Perps10
Why these marks ↓
Gains Network
Median 78 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗
Jupiter Perps
Median 117 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗
Status transparency8% of the scoreJupiter Perps leads
Gains Network2
Jupiter Perps5
Why these marks ↓
Gains Network
No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.
Jupiter Perps
A status page exists but publishes no feed we could parse — readable, not auditable. Part of that may be our blind spot (we read three platforms). This is a company-wide status page shared with 2 other rated products, so it describes the company's systems rather than this product alone.Evidence ↗

The numbers side by side

MeasuredGains NetworkJupiter Perps
Value locked$8.7M$745.0M
Published audits10
Track record4.9 yr2.7 yr
Chains51
Latency (our probe)78 ms117 ms
Status feednoneunknown

Where each one falls short

Gains Network

Status transparency: No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.

Not for: Anyone who needs to know when it breaks: no status feed, so you find out it is down by discovering it yourself.

Jupiter Perps

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Not for: Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

Which to choose

Which scores higher overall, Gains Network or Jupiter Perps?+

Gains Network scores 6.24/10 against 6.16/10 for Jupiter Perps, on the same criteria and weights. We measured 100% of the score for Gains Network and 100% for Jupiter Perps.

Which to choose if scale of value trusted matters most?+

Jupiter Perps: 8/10 against 4/10 for Gains Network on scale of value trusted. $745.0M in value locked (DefiLlama).

Which to choose if security audits matters most?+

Gains Network: 6/10 against 2/10 for Jupiter Perps on security audits. 1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself.

Which to choose if multi-chain reach matters most?+

Gains Network: 9/10 against 6/10 for Jupiter Perps on multi-chain reach. Deployed on 5 chains (DefiLlama).

Which to choose if status transparency matters most?+

Jupiter Perps: 5/10 against 2/10 for Gains Network on status transparency. A status page exists but publishes no feed we could parse — readable, not auditable.

Other comparisons

Full perpetual dexs ranking