Skip to main content
CoinPulse
Head to head · Perpetual DEXs

Aevo vs Hyperliquid

Aevo
Status page, no readable feed
6.68
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#2 of 14
vs
Hyperliquid
Not published
6.6
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#3 of 14

Aevo scores higher: 6.68/10 against 6.6/10. It leads on 2 of 6 criteria, Hyperliquid on 1.

Data collected No affiliate links How scores are built

Criterion by criterion

Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.

Scale of value trusted30% of the scoreHyperliquid leads
Aevo5
Hyperliquid9
Why these marks ↓
Aevo
$14.7M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Hyperliquid
$6.78B in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Security audits26% of the scoreAevo leads
Aevo6
Hyperliquid2
Why these marks ↓
Aevo
1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.Evidence ↗
Hyperliquid
No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.Evidence ↗
Track record18% of the scoreLevel
Aevo9
Hyperliquid9
Why these marks ↓
Aevo
Live 3.5 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Hyperliquid
Live 3.5 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Multi-chain reach10% of the scoreLevel
Aevo8
Hyperliquid8
Why these marks ↓
Aevo
Deployed on 4 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.Evidence ↗
Hyperliquid
Deployed on 2 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.Evidence ↗
Latency8% of the scoreLevel
Aevo10
Hyperliquid10
Why these marks ↓
Aevo
Median 106 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗
Hyperliquid
Median 56 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.Evidence ↗
Status transparency8% of the scoreAevo leads
Aevo5
Hyperliquid2
Why these marks ↓
Aevo
A status page exists but publishes no feed we could parse — readable, not auditable. Part of that may be our blind spot (we read three platforms).Evidence ↗
Hyperliquid
No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.

The numbers side by side

MeasuredAevoHyperliquid
Value locked$14.7M$6.78B
Published audits10
Track record3.5 yr3.5 yr
Chains42
Latency (our probe)106 ms56 ms
Status feedunknownnone

Where each one falls short

Aevo

Scale of value trusted: $14.7M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

Hyperliquid

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Not for: Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

Which to choose

Which scores higher overall, Aevo or Hyperliquid?+

Aevo scores 6.68/10 against 6.6/10 for Hyperliquid, on the same criteria and weights. We measured 100% of the score for Aevo and 100% for Hyperliquid.

Which to choose if scale of value trusted matters most?+

Hyperliquid: 9/10 against 5/10 for Aevo on scale of value trusted. $6.78B in value locked (DefiLlama).

Which to choose if security audits matters most?+

Aevo: 6/10 against 2/10 for Hyperliquid on security audits. 1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself.

Which to choose if status transparency matters most?+

Aevo: 5/10 against 2/10 for Hyperliquid on status transparency. A status page exists but publishes no feed we could parse — readable, not auditable.

Other comparisons

Full perpetual dexs ranking