MyEtherWallet vs Zerion
MyEtherWallet wins on measured health — 10/10 against 9.15/10. Note the coverage gap: we measured 56% of the criteria for MyEtherWallet and 78% for Zerion. Some of that gap is the finding — a service that publishes less can be measured less.
Last collection 2026-08-25: probed 252 services, measured 233, over a 90-day window.
| Measured | MyEtherWallet | Zerion |
|---|---|---|
| Status now | Not published | Operational |
| Score On what we could measure: 56% of the criteria weight for MyEtherWallet, 78% for Zerion. | 10/10 | 9.15/10 |
| Age | 11.7 yr | 10.7 yr |
| Latency (our probe) | 143 ms | 180 ms |
| Median fix | — | — |
| Status feed | blocked | instatus |
MyEtherWallet
10 / 1056% measuredLive 11.7 yr (since founding (2015), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.
Median 143 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.
Their status host turned our probe away — the page exists and we could not read it, so n/a rather than a mark against them.
No incident feed we can read, so no repair time to compute.
Zerion
9.15 / 1078% measuredLive 10.7 yr (since founding (2016), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.
Median 180 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.
Publishes a live machine-readable status, but no incident archive: you can see it is down now, not how often it broke before.
No incident feed we can read, so no repair time to compute.
Status transparency: Publishes a live machine-readable status, but no incident archive: you can see it is down now, not how often it broke before.
No affiliate links or ads anywhere on this site. How this is funded · Methodology · Full crypto wallets ranking