Skip to main content
CoinPulse
Head to head · Yield aggregators

CIAN Yield Layer vs vfat.io

CIAN Yield Layer
Not published
8.27
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#1 of 15
vs
vfat.io
Not published
8.26
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#2 of 15

CIAN Yield Layer scores higher: 8.27/10 against 8.26/10. It leads on 1 of 4 criteria, vfat.io on 2.

Data collected No affiliate links How scores are built

Criterion by criterion

Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.

Security audits33% of the scoreLevel
CIAN Yield Layer10
vfat.io10
Why these marks ↓
CIAN Yield Layer
4 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.Evidence ↗
vfat.io
3 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.Evidence ↗
Scale of value trusted31% of the scoreCIAN Yield Layer leads
CIAN Yield Layer8
vfat.io6
Why these marks ↓
CIAN Yield Layer
$315.9M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
vfat.io
$36.4M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Track record25% of the scorevfat.io leads
CIAN Yield Layer6
vfat.io8
Why these marks ↓
CIAN Yield Layer
Live 1.9 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
vfat.io
Live 2.4 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Multi-chain reach11% of the scorevfat.io leads
CIAN Yield Layer9
vfat.io10
Why these marks ↓
CIAN Yield Layer
Deployed on 7 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.Evidence ↗
vfat.io
Deployed on 38 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.Evidence ↗

The numbers side by side

MeasuredCIAN Yield Layervfat.io
Value locked$315.9M$36.4M
Published audits43
Track record1.9 yr2.4 yr
Chains738

Where each one falls short

CIAN Yield Layer

Track record: Live 1.9 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

vfat.io

Scale of value trusted: $36.4M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

Which to choose

Which scores higher overall, CIAN Yield Layer or vfat.io?+

CIAN Yield Layer scores 8.27/10 against 8.26/10 for vfat.io, on the same criteria and weights. We measured 100% of the score for CIAN Yield Layer and 100% for vfat.io.

Which to choose if scale of value trusted matters most?+

CIAN Yield Layer: 8/10 against 6/10 for vfat.io on scale of value trusted. $315.9M in value locked (DefiLlama).

Which to choose if track record matters most?+

vfat.io: 8/10 against 6/10 for CIAN Yield Layer on track record. Live 2.4 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)).

Which to choose if multi-chain reach matters most?+

vfat.io: 10/10 against 9/10 for CIAN Yield Layer on multi-chain reach. Deployed on 38 chains (DefiLlama).

Other comparisons

Full yield aggregators ranking