Skip to main content
btc$82,637-0.42%eth$2,499-2.44%usdt$0.9992-0.01%bnb$742.72-3.38%xrp$1.40-1.05%usdc$0.9996-0.00%sol$110.33-4.00%trx$0.3320-1.23%figr_heloc$1.03—zec$1,228+0.35%hype$86.10-1.20%doge$0.0850-3.73%xmr$540.38-2.66%usds$0.9994+0.04%wbt$81.23-1.70%link$12.88-1.96%btc$82,637-0.42%eth$2,499-2.44%usdt$0.9992-0.01%bnb$742.72-3.38%xrp$1.40-1.05%usdc$0.9996-0.00%sol$110.33-4.00%trx$0.3320-1.23%figr_heloc$1.03—zec$1,228+0.35%hype$86.10-1.20%doge$0.0850-3.73%xmr$540.38-2.66%usds$0.9994+0.04%wbt$81.23-1.70%link$12.88-1.96%
CoinPulse

Best yield aggregators

Automated yield vaults. We scored 15 of them 0–10 from public data — tvl and audits (defillama) — and ranked the 15 we could measure well enough to place fairly. No affiliate links: the order reflects the evidence, nothing else.

Top rated
Beefy
7.88/1075% measured
Runner-up
Yearn Finance
7.73/10
Coverage
15 ranked
15 registered

Last collection 2026-08-25: probed 252 services, measured 233, over a 90-day window. Collected by our own script, not by hand — reproducible, and reproducibly boring.

The full ranking

#ServiceScoreTVLAuditsAgeChains
1Beefy7.8875%$111.3M2—40
2Yearn Finance7.7375%$194.7M2—7
3Meteora vaults7.41100%$50.3M23.8y1
4Vesper7.3275%$75.1M2—5
5vfat.io7.29100%$27.2M22.3y18
6Lulo7.16100%$53.8M22.0y1
7Fusion by IPOR7.1100%$57.8M21.9y11
8YO Protocol6.88100%$37.9M21.4y4
9AlphaFi Agg6.85100%$17.8M22.1y1
10Harvest Finance6.0375%$18.9M1—5
11DeFindex5.85100%$19.6M2195d1
12CIAN Yield Layer5.63100%$300.9M01.8y7
13Fluid Lite4.6575%$179.6M0—1
14Hyperbeat Earn4.37100%$25.6M01.3y1
15Kinetiq Earn4.18100%$57.1M0328d1

Every figure carries the date it was taken, on the service’s card below, linked to its open source. Score is out of what we could measure — the % beside it is coverage.

How we scored yield aggregators

These weights belong to this category alone. Signature measurement here: TVL and audits (DefiLlama) — Vaults route other people's money through many protocols; audits and value locked lead. STATUS not scored for on-chain protocols.

SCALE
31%↑7
Scale of value trusted

How much value the market trusts it with — TVL, reserves or market cap.

AUDIT
33%↑13
Security audits

Published third-party security audits, with links to the findings.

TRACK
25%↑7
Track record

How long it has run and survived — time is signal.

REACH
11%
Multi-chain reach

How many chains it is deployed across.

Latency in this category is timed at the live interface for every service, so the comparison is like-for-like. We never compare latency across categories — a DEX interface and an exchange API are not the same thing, and pretending otherwise would just reward whoever we happened to probe more cheaply.

The brief also defines FEES and UX (0%, 0%). We don’t publish them: we can’t measure them ourselves, and an estimate dressed as a measurement is worse than a gap. Full methodology

The services

B
Not publishedFull review →
7.88 / 1075% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
41% weight7/10

$111.3M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
44% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
n/a

No documented launch or listing date to measure age from.

REACHMulti-chain reach
15% weight10/10

Deployed on 40 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Scale of value trusted: $111.3M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

7.73 / 1075% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
41% weight7/10

$194.7M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
44% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
n/a

No documented launch or listing date to measure age from.

REACHMulti-chain reach
15% weight9/10

Deployed on 7 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Scale of value trusted: $194.7M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

7.41 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
31% weight6/10

$50.3M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
33% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
25% weight9/10

Live 3.8 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
11% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Measured, but not scored
Response time131 ms

Timed at a different surface from the rest of this category, so not a fair comparison — not scored.

Where we docked points

Scale of value trusted: $50.3M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

V
Not publishedFull review →
7.32 / 1075% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
41% weight6/10

$75.1M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
44% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
n/a

No documented launch or listing date to measure age from.

REACHMulti-chain reach
15% weight9/10

Deployed on 5 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Scale of value trusted: $75.1M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

v
Not publishedFull review →
7.29 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
31% weight5/10

$27.2M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
33% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
25% weight8/10

Live 2.3 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
11% weight10/10

Deployed on 18 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Measured, but not scored
Response time92 ms

Timed at a different surface from the rest of this category, so not a fair comparison — not scored.

Where we docked points

Scale of value trusted: $27.2M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

L
Not publishedFull review →
7.16 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
31% weight6/10

$53.8M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
33% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
25% weight8/10

Live 2.0 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
11% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Scale of value trusted: $53.8M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

7.1 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
31% weight6/10

$57.8M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
33% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
25% weight6/10

Live 1.9 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
11% weight10/10

Deployed on 11 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Measured, but not scored
Response time23 ms

Timed at a different surface from the rest of this category, so not a fair comparison — not scored.

Where we docked points

Scale of value trusted: $57.8M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

6.88 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
31% weight6/10

$37.9M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
33% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
25% weight6/10

Live 1.4 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
11% weight8/10

Deployed on 4 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Scale of value trusted: $37.9M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

6.85 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
31% weight5/10

$17.8M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
33% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
25% weight8/10

Live 2.1 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
11% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Scale of value trusted: $17.8M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

6.03 / 1075% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
41% weight5/10

$18.9M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
44% weight6/10

1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
n/a

No documented launch or listing date to measure age from.

REACHMulti-chain reach
15% weight9/10

Deployed on 5 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Scale of value trusted: $18.9M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

D
Not publishedFull review →
5.85 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
31% weight5/10

$19.6M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
33% weight8/10

2 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
25% weight4/10

Live 195 days (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
11% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Track record: Live 195 days (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

5.63 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
31% weight8/10

$300.9M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
33% weight2/10

No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
25% weight6/10

Live 1.8 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
11% weight9/10

Deployed on 7 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Measured, but not scored
Response time178 ms

Timed at a different surface from the rest of this category, so not a fair comparison — not scored.

Where we docked points

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Who this is NOT for

Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

F
4.65 / 1075% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
41% weight7/10

$179.6M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
44% weight2/10

No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
n/a

No documented launch or listing date to measure age from.

REACHMulti-chain reach
15% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Who this is NOT for

Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

4.37 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
31% weight5/10

$25.6M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
33% weight2/10

No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
25% weight6/10

Live 1.3 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
11% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Where we docked points

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Who this is NOT for

Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

4.18 / 10100% measured
Criteria
SCALEScale of value trusted
31% weight6/10

$57.1M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
AUDITSecurity audits
33% weight2/10

No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
TRACKTrack record
25% weight4/10

Live 328 days (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
REACHMulti-chain reach
11% weight6/10

Deployed on 1 chain (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.

measured 2026-08-25 11:09 UTCevidence ↗
Measured, but not scored
Response time227 ms

Timed at a different surface from the rest of this category, so not a fair comparison — not scored.

Where we docked points

Security audits: No published audits on DefiLlama. Not proof of insecurity, but an unaudited contract holding funds is a red flag.

Who this is NOT for

Anyone putting size into it: it holds funds in smart contracts with no published audit. Fine to experiment with, not to trust with a position you cannot afford to lose.

Who we left out, and why

We looked at 15, ranked 15.

Head to head

How to choose yield aggregators

Automated yield vaults — and the honest truth is that no single ranking fits everyone. Our scores tell you what is best-evidenced on public data: tvl and audits (defillama). Use them as a shortlist, not a verdict.

Start at the top of the table, then open the full breakdown for any service you are considering. Read the coverage figure beside its score — a high number on thin coverage is a narrower claim than the same score fully measured. Check the “where we docked points” and “who it’s not for” notes on each card; the service that scores highest overall is not always the one that fits your specific need. And remember what these scores deliberately leave out — fees and support quality — which you should weigh yourself before committing.

Yield aggregators ratings — FAQ

How are yield aggregators ranked on this page?+

Each service is scored 0–10 from public data — tvl and audits (defillama) — weighted for what matters in this category, plus our own latency and status checks. 15 of 15 are ranked; the rest we could not measure enough to place fairly. Every figure is dated and links to its source.

What is the best yield aggregator?+

On the data we could measure, Beefy scores highest at 7.88/10, ahead of Yearn Finance (7.73/10). "Best" here means best-evidenced, not most advertised — open each service below for the full breakdown and decide what fits your needs.

Why isn’t the biggest name at the top?+

Size is not a criterion. A large service that publishes no audits or status page cannot demonstrate its safety from the outside, so it scores below a smaller one that can — even if it is perfectly sound. We rate what is verifiable, not what is famous.

What does the "% measured" figure under a score mean?+

It is the share of this category's criteria weight we could actually fill for that service. Anything we could not measure is marked n/a and its weight is redistributed across the rest — never counted as zero — so the percentage tells you how complete the verdict is.

Do you earn money from these rankings?+

No. There are no affiliate links, no paid placements and no sponsored entries anywhere in the ratings section. That is what lets this list put a smaller, audited service above a bigger, opaque one.

No affiliate links, paid placements or ads anywhere on this site. How this is funded · Methodology