Skip to main content
CoinPulse
Head to head · Yield aggregators

CIAN Yield Layer vs Beefy

CIAN Yield Layer
Not published
8.27
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#1 of 15
vs
Beefy
Not published
7.75
out of 10
100% of the score measured
#3 of 15

CIAN Yield Layer scores higher: 8.27/10 against 7.75/10. It leads on 2 of 4 criteria, Beefy on 2.

Data collected No affiliate links How scores are built

Criterion by criterion

Same category, same weights, heaviest criterion first. Open a row for each side’s reasoning and evidence.

Security audits33% of the scoreCIAN Yield Layer leads
CIAN Yield Layer10
Beefy6
Why these marks ↓
CIAN Yield Layer
4 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.Evidence ↗
Beefy
1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.Evidence ↗
Scale of value trusted31% of the scoreCIAN Yield Layer leads
CIAN Yield Layer8
Beefy7
Why these marks ↓
CIAN Yield Layer
$315.9M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Beefy
$110.8M in value locked (DefiLlama). Capital is the market voting with its money — scored on a log scale, so the jump from $10M to $100M counts for more than $10B to $20B.Evidence ↗
Track record25% of the scoreBeefy leads
CIAN Yield Layer6
Beefy10
Why these marks ↓
CIAN Yield Layer
Live 1.9 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Beefy
Live 6.3 yr (since launch (2020; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.Evidence ↗
Multi-chain reach11% of the scoreBeefy leads
CIAN Yield Layer9
Beefy10
Why these marks ↓
CIAN Yield Layer
Deployed on 7 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.Evidence ↗
Beefy
Deployed on 42 chains (DefiLlama). Breadth is a minor tie-breaker — a focused single-chain protocol can still be excellent.Evidence ↗

The numbers side by side

MeasuredCIAN Yield LayerBeefy
Value locked$315.9M$110.8M
Published audits41
Track record1.9 yr6.3 yr
Chains742

Where each one falls short

CIAN Yield Layer

Track record: Live 1.9 yr (time since DefiLlama listing (a floor on true age)). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.

Beefy

Security audits: 1 published audit with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself. Audits reduce risk, they do not remove it.

Which to choose

Which scores higher overall, CIAN Yield Layer or Beefy?+

CIAN Yield Layer scores 8.27/10 against 7.75/10 for Beefy, on the same criteria and weights. We measured 100% of the score for CIAN Yield Layer and 100% for Beefy.

Which to choose if security audits matters most?+

CIAN Yield Layer: 10/10 against 6/10 for Beefy on security audits. 4 published audits with links (DefiLlama) — read the findings yourself.

Which to choose if track record matters most?+

Beefy: 10/10 against 6/10 for CIAN Yield Layer on track record. Live 6.3 yr (since launch (2020; a year without a month counts from Jul 1), public record).

Which to choose if scale of value trusted matters most?+

CIAN Yield Layer: 8/10 against 7/10 for Beefy on scale of value trusted. $315.9M in value locked (DefiLlama).

Which to choose if multi-chain reach matters most?+

Beefy: 10/10 against 9/10 for CIAN Yield Layer on multi-chain reach. Deployed on 42 chains (DefiLlama).

Other comparisons

Full yield aggregators ranking