Bitsgap vs TradeSanta
A tie, on what we measured. Both score 7.8/10. The difference between them is not something our probe can see, so we are not going to invent one.
Last collection 2026-08-25: probed 252 services, measured 233, over a 90-day window.
| Measured | Bitsgap | TradeSanta |
|---|---|---|
| Status now | Not published | Not published |
| Score On what we could measure: 80% of the criteria weight for Bitsgap, 80% for TradeSanta. | 7.8/10 | 7.8/10 |
| Age | 9.7 yr | 8.7 yr |
| Latency (our probe) | 99 ms | 126 ms |
| Median fix | — | — |
| Status feed | none | none |
Bitsgap
7.8 / 1080% measuredLive 9.7 yr (since founding (2017), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.
Median 99 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.
No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.
No incident feed we can read, so no repair time to compute.
Status transparency: No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.
Anyone who needs to know when it breaks: no status feed, so you find out it is down by discovering it yourself.
TradeSanta
7.8 / 1080% measuredLive 8.7 yr (since founding (2018), public record). Most failures happen young, so time survived is real signal.
Median 126 ms to first byte from the live interface, our own probe, slowest sample discarded, single location. Compared only within this category.
No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.
No incident feed we can read, so no repair time to compute.
Status transparency: No public status page found. Nothing about its reliability can be verified from outside — including by us.
Anyone who needs to know when it breaks: no status feed, so you find out it is down by discovering it yourself.
No affiliate links in this section. How this is funded · Methodology · Full trading tools ranking